ITIL v5 Compass
Leadership & Implementation
Operating Model Design

Operating Model Design

From Framework to Organizational Structure

An operating model defines how an organization structures people, processes, technology, and partnerships to deliver value. ITIL v5 provides the conceptual framework; this content translates that framework into practical organizational design decisions.

Key Design Inputs from ITIL v5

1. Value Chain Patterns

The Value Chain describes five patterns that define which lifecycle activities an organization performs:

PatternLifecycle ActivitiesTypical Organization
Full lifecycle providerAll 8 (Discover through Support)Enterprise IT, large ISVs
Internal IT with external productsDiscover, Design, Acquire, Transition, Operate, Deliver, SupportEnterprise IT using SaaS/COTS
Service integratorDiscover, Acquire, Transition, Deliver, SupportMSPs, outsourcing providers
Digital product vendorDiscover, Design, Build, TransitionISVs, product companies
Custom software developmentDesign, Build, TransitionDevelopment agencies, consultancies

Most organizations combine patterns. Design your operating model to accommodate this reality.

2. Four Dimensions

Every organizational design decision should be evaluated against the Four Dimensions:

DimensionDesign Question
Organizations and PeopleHow are teams structured? Who is accountable for what?
Information and TechnologyWhat tools support the operating model? How does data flow?
Partners and SuppliersWhich activities involve external parties? How are they governed?
Value Streams and ProcessesHow does work flow through the organization? Where are the handoffs?

Team Topology Models

Model A: Functional Teams (Traditional)

Teams are organized by technical function: network, servers, applications, database, security, service desk.

Advantages:

  • Deep technical specialization
  • Clear career paths
  • Efficient resource utilization

Disadvantages:

  • Handoffs between teams create delays
  • No single team owns the end-to-end service
  • "Throw it over the wall" culture

Alignment: Functional teams align well with individual management practices but poorly with lifecycle activities.

Model B: Product Teams (Modern)

Cross-functional teams are organized around a product or group of related products. Each team includes development, operations, and support capabilities.

Advantages:

  • End-to-end ownership
  • Faster decision-making
  • Direct alignment with value streams

Disadvantages:

  • Potential duplication of skills
  • Harder to maintain standards across teams
  • Requires mature engineering culture

Alignment: Product teams naturally align with the Product and Service Lifecycle.

Model C: Platform and Stream Teams (Team Topologies)

Based on the Team Topologies model (Skelton and Pais), four team types interact:

Team TypeRoleITIL v5 Alignment
Stream-alignedDelivers value for a specific business domainPerforms lifecycle activities for a specific value stream
PlatformProvides internal services to stream-aligned teamsEnables Operate and Transition through self-service infrastructure
EnablingHelps stream-aligned teams adopt new capabilitiesSupports Continual Improvement and knowledge transfer
Complicated subsystemManages technically complex componentsOperates specialized technology (AI/ML, legacy systems)

This model provides the strongest alignment with v5's value stream and lifecycle concepts.

Model D: Hybrid (Most Common)

Most organizations use a hybrid model:

  • Product/stream-aligned teams for customer-facing services
  • Shared services for common capabilities (service desk, security, compliance)
  • Platform team for infrastructure and tooling
  • Centre of excellence for practice standardization and governance

Design Process: Step by Step

Step 1: Map Your Value Streams

Before designing teams, map actual value streams. A value stream is the end-to-end flow of work from a customer need to a delivered outcome.

Step 2: Identify Required Capabilities

For each value stream, identify which ITIL practices and lifecycle activities are needed:

  • Which of the 34 practices are critical?
  • Which lifecycle activities does the value stream traverse?
  • What skills, tools, and information are required?

Step 3: Choose a Team Topology

Based on your value streams, organizational size, and culture:

FactorFavours FunctionalFavours Product/Stream
Organization size (under 50 IT staff)Likely necessaryMay lack critical mass
Organization size (> 200 IT staff)Creates bottlenecksEnables autonomy
Regulatory requirementsCentralized controlFederated control with guardrails
Speed of changeSlower but controlledFaster but requires discipline
Technical diversitySpecialized expertiseBroad expertise per team

Step 4: Define Governance Interfaces

Regardless of topology, define how teams interact with governance:

  • Approval workflows: Who approves changes, releases, and exceptions?
  • Escalation paths: How do incidents, risks, and decisions escalate?
  • Reporting lines: What information flows to governance bodies and when?
  • Standards and policies: How are cross-cutting standards maintained?

Step 5: Design RACI for Lifecycle Activities

Create a RACI (Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed) matrix for each lifecycle activity:

Lifecycle ActivityProduct TeamPlatform TeamService DeskSecurityGovernance
DiscoverR, ACICI
DesignR, ACCCI
AcquireRCICA
BuildR, ACICI
TransitionRRCRA
OperateCR, AIRI
DeliverRCR, AII
SupportRCRCI

Step 6: Define Interaction Modes

How do teams interact? The three primary modes:

ModeDescriptionWhen to use
CollaborationTwo teams work closely together on a shared goalDuring discovery, design, and early build phases
X-as-a-ServiceOne team provides a service to the otherStable interfaces: platform services, shared tools
FacilitatingOne team helps another build a new capabilityDuring adoption of new practices, tools, or methods

Anti-patterns in Operating Model Design

Anti-patternSymptomResolution
"Everyone owns everything"Nothing gets done; no accountabilityDefine clear ownership using RACI
"Siloed product teams"Teams duplicate work; inconsistent practicesEstablish shared platforms and enabling teams
"Monolithic shared services"Bottlenecks; all requests go through one teamDecompose into platform services with self-service interfaces
"Governance as gatekeeper"Slow approvals; teams circumvent processesShift to governance by design (guardrails, not gates)
"Copying another company's model"Model does not fit contextDesign from your value streams, not from a template

Related Pages


Last updated on April 2, 2026

ITIL® is a registered trademark of PeopleCert. © 2026 ITIL v5 Compass